Tuesday, 4 December 2012
Monday, 26 November 2012
Thursday, 22 November 2012
Thursday, 8 November 2012
Wednesday, 7 November 2012
Sunday, 4 November 2012
THISIS1000.NEWS: YOUR DAILY NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT WORLD STAY TUNED: @Thisis1000 ENT Report: Sun NOV/4/2012
THISIS1000.NEWS: YOUR DAILY NEWS & ENTERTAINMENT WORLD STAY TUNED: @Thisis1000 ENT Report: Sun NOV/4/2012: Busted: Donald Trump Caught Lying About China & Romney? Cassidy Says He Would Battle Meek Mill For $100K! [Audio] Rihanna Starts Her ...
Saturday, 3 November 2012
Thursday, 1 November 2012
Tuesday, 30 October 2012
Thursday, 25 October 2012
Wednesday, 24 October 2012
Tuesday, 23 October 2012
Watch "Marsha Buckley - Turn Me Over (Final) @B_Mellos Produced by Rivoli ENT @screechbeats @rivolient1" on YouTube
Saturday, 20 October 2012
Friday, 19 October 2012
Thursday, 18 October 2012
Wednesday, 17 October 2012
iPad mini speculation soars as Apple confirms Oct. 23 announcement
Apple is dangling a carrot in front of tech speculators by confirming it will have an announcement next Tuesday.
“We’ve got a little more to show you,” the world’s most valuable company said coyly in its announcement Tuesday of a “media event.”
The invitation, send to Apple-chosen tech journalists, came with a vague image of an Apple logo.
Bloomberg on Oct. 12 reported that an Oct. 23 Apple announcement would likely reveal the iPad mini, a 7.85-inch version that trims the iPad’s current 9.7 inches.
“A smaller, less expensive iPad could undercut the tablet ambitions of Google Inc., Microsoft Corp. and Amazon.com Inc., according to Shaw Wu, an analyst at Sterne Agee & Leach Inc,” Bloomberg reported.
“Apple’s new device will probably have a price closer to Google’s Nexus 7 tablet and some versions of Amazon’s Kindle Fire, which have 7-inch screens and cost $199.”
“It would be the competitors’ worst nightmare,” Wu said in an earlier Bloomberg interview.
The new iPad mini would arrive just in time for the holiday buying season.
Apple holds 61 per cent of the tablet market, with sales expected to reach $63.2 billion this year, according to analysts. Competitors have tried to make inroads with smaller tablets and combined smartphones and tablets known as phablets.
Lance Armstrong steps down as chairman of cancer charity, dumped by Nike
A week after being labelled ring-leader of the biggest doping fraud in sports history, cyclist Lance Armstrong has stepped down as chairman of his cancer awareness charity and lost the backing of his sponsor Nike.
The company said Wednesday that it was acting in the face of “seemingly insurmountable evidence” that its former client doped and “misled Nike for more than a decade.”
The public rebuke came shortly after Mr. Armstrong acknowledged the toll the doping accusations were taking and their interference with his charity work. In a statement Wednesday, Mr. Armstrong said he was acting to prevent the foundation suffering “negative effects as a result of controversy surrounding my cycling career.”
The move comes after attempts by Mr. Armstrong to use his cancer-awareness status to change the channel in the face of damning accusations of doping.
In the late summer, shortly after the United States Anti-Doping Agency labelled him a drug cheat and called for his seven Tour de France titles to be stripped, Mr. Armstrong used an appearance at the World Cancer Congress in Montreal to insist that he had won those races. Last week, when USADA released more than 1,000 pages of documents to buttress its case, Mr. Armstrong tweeted that that night he would be “Hanging with my family, unaffected, and thinking about this,” followed by a link to the charity.
In its statement, Nike said that it would continue to support the Livestrong charity but “does not condone the use of illegal performance enhancing drugs in any manner.” Their decision was announced a day after a small protest, including a former teammate of Mr. Armstrong, demonstrated outside the company’s Oregon headquarters with signs such as “For clean sport; No drugs; No bullies; No lies.” Also Tuesday, the company denied an allegation it helped pay to cover up a positive drug test by Mr. Armstrong.
According to USADA, Mr. Armstrong presided over a years-long doping conspiracy that involved cheating on an epic scale and pressuring supporting riders on his team into using illegal drugs to further his career.
“Armstrong said, ‘we had one goal and one ambition and that was to win the greatest bike race in the world and not just to win it once, but to keep winning it’,” USADA said in the report summarizing its evidence. “However, the path he chose to pursue that goal ran far outside the rules. His goal led him to depend on EPO, testosterone and blood transfusions but also, more ruthlessly, to expect and to require that his teammates would likewise use drugs to support his goals if not their own.”
The USADA case was supported by banking information, communication intercepts, lab results and testimony from 26 witnesses, 11 of them former team-mates of Mr. Armstrong. Some of these witnesses have been publicly on the outs with him but others had no apparent axe to grind and the testimony George Hincapie, in particular, is seen as particularly damaging. Mr. Hincapie, who was described by Mr. Armstrong as his “best bro” and rode alongside him throughout his career, said that he saw the Texan use banned drugs and was given such drugs by him for his own use.
In his affidavit, Mr. Hincapie said that he had knowledge of Mr. Armstrong breaking the rules by taking the blood-booster EPO, testosterone, illicit blood transfusions and human growth hormone, though he is alleged to have stopped using the latter after surviving cancer. He also related being asked to go to Mr. Armstrong’s Spanish apartment after he retired “to make sure there was nothing there,” which he took to mean a sweep for doping materials.
Mr. Armstrong chose not to contest the evidence gathered by USADA, which the anti-doping agency is treating as a tacit admission of guilt. Their case was forwarded last week to the Union Cycliste Internationale, which governs the sport professionally. The UCI has until the end of the month to approve USADA’s punishment, formally stripping Mr. Armstrong of all results since August of 1998, or can appeal to the Court of Arbitration for Sport.
The real Fifty Shades: Inside the real world of submissive sexuality
Sophie Morgan’s ideal man must like children and animals, care about his job, get past her “Marmite-y breath,” and be thoughtful, loving and clever.
“Oh, and have a penchant for hurting, controlling and humiliating me in as many imaginable, degrading ways he could come up with,” writes Morgan, the author of Diary of a Submissive, which recently made The Sunday Times bestseller list.
MORE RELATED TO THIS STORY
Mom's guilty pleasure: kinky bedtime stories
LYNN CROSBIE Does Fifty Shades cast a pall on feminism?
Are younger women less sexually hungry than their mothers?
Morgan’s is the latest tract to fetishize the slavish woman post-Fifty Shades of Grey – but this one’s a memoir. Writing under a pseudonym, the 33-year-old British reporter offers an inside track to the dominance and submission (D/s) lifestyle. Forget “attractive, very attractive” Christian Grey: Most doms and subs aren’t “even remarkable in their unremarkableness,” writes Morgan. Even so, there’s no end in sight to flushed faces, erect nipples, leather paddles and diabolically chuckling men, not to mention one hell of a use for the chopsticks and rubber bands kicking around in your kitchen drawer.
For all the whimpering – and problematic feminist ramifications – Morgan argues that submission serves as a restorative mental vacation from her work week. Morgan spoke with The Globe and Mail from the safe confines of her car during a lunch break.
Watching Robin Hood as a child, your ‘heart raced’ every time you saw Maid Marian locked away in a dungeon. Is that how this all started?
I started watching it around 8, so it wasn’t sexual. There was something just very intriguing about her being defiant and having all these things happen to her. Interestingly, my boyfriend had a similar thing for Penelope Pitstop, a Hanna-Barbera cartoon character who spends a lot of time tied to train tracks.
As an adult, you want gender parity with the guys who dominate you – you want to debate politics with them, but also complete submission sexually. How does that work?
I would say that I’m a feminist: I want to be paid the same salary that my male contemporaries would be paid, I want my reproductive rights and my rights to do want I want socially. It seems incongruous but once in a while, with someone I trust and in a context I’m comfortable with, I’d like to give those rights up for a while.
Are you a feminist’s worst nightmare?
There are schools of feminist thought that are really antagonistic about the rise of Fifty Shades of Grey eroticism. They see it as either a failure or a betrayal of feminism. I don’t think it is, as long as it’s done fundamentally as a choice. I’m uncomfortable with anybody telling me what is acceptable for me to do or not do sexually.
How do you blur the lines between sex and ‘normal life’?
It can be very intense and then afterward my boyfriend will make a cup of tea and we’ll have a chocolate biscuit on the sofa watching TiVo. That’s what’s nice about it, you have the normality that comes back afterward.
Let’s turn to some of the curiosities of the ‘D/s’ community. What is with the upper/lowercase stuff?
If I was writing as a submissive woman, then ‘i’ should be lowercase, and if I was writing to a dominant, then I should capitalize the “Y” on “you,” no matter where it is in the sentence. Stuff like that bugs me amazingly.
What about ‘munches’ – meet and greets for dominants and submissives hosted in nondescript pubs?
I find those very awkward. I really like Marmite, however I’m not sure that I could go and meet a bunch of people who all happen to like Marmite, as if that was enough of a connection to have a happy time together.
We were just a friendly, tacky bunch of people – no one was in leather trousers or chains.
What are ‘switches’?
Switches are people who can be dominant or submissive, depending on who they’re with and where the mood takes them. Both genders are as likely to be switches. But as with elements of the lesbian community who are a bit suspicious of bisexual women, sometimes it’s the same thing with switches: “You should make a choice, one way or the other.”
People also use safe words.
A safe word you’d use to either slow things down or stop them altogether. The nature of the power dynamic is that sometimes people enjoy saying “no” but they’re not necessarily meaning “no,” so this is a safety net for everyone concerned. Safe words are like pin numbers. A lot of people use the traffic-light system: Red is your safe word, but if you’re having trouble with something you might say “amber.” I have very random words. My current one is flugelhorn.
One stipulation you have is that you don’t want day-to-day arguments with boyfriends to later re-emerge in bed. Why?
It’s important to separate the two, in that this is a sexual dynamic and fun play – it’s not about him caning me because I forgot to do the washing up. You should be having frank discussions when you’re angry. If you’re having that conversation in a dominant/submissive mindset, then instantly there’s a power imbalance.
Do you ever have sex without getting roughed up?
Absolutely. There are days when you get home from work and you’re both knackered. Sometimes we don’t have sex at all, or if we have sex, it’s cuddly, lazy sex. If you existed on brownies with chocolate ice cream every day, it would get boring.
Erotica and BDSM have certainly been around. Why did Fifty Shades catch like wildfire?
Fifty Shades is very much about being looked after. It’s about the bajillionaire in his penthouse sending her Macbooks and BlackBerries. It’s not even about BDSM for a great lot of the book: It’s about this impossibly handsome rich man.
The trilogy’s been dubbed mommy porn and sadism for soccer moms. How is yours being received?
In the U.K., there’s definitely been crossover. I’m on Twitter so I get to talk to people who read it and it really makes me laugh, people who tell me, “That chopstick thing was disgusting” or, “Ah! The foot thing!”
Wives routinely tout Fifty Shades as a kickstarter in their stagnant sex lives. What happens if she’s fired up on grey ties and hubby’s not into it?
BDSM can be pretty much anything you want it to be, from being tied up to being hurt to the full-on humiliation that I write about. It doesn’t have to be massively intense; it can be something as simple as a blindfold or gently scratching with your fingernails. It can be very sensual. You just have to try it and see what works for both of you.
What do you make of the oft-repeated suggestion that Fifty Shades and submission in general appeals to women – especially working women – because they’re tired and don’t want to do the work in bed, that they just want to lie around?
There’s a misconception that submission means being passive and I don’t think that’s true. Sometimes, submission is a lot more pro-active. You’re doing things to your dominant.
Sounds like you did plenty of work yourself.
I find it very cathartic. It really keeps my brain ticking, it’s very challenging and interesting. Every time we have sex it has a different dynamic to it. Afterward, I’m pleasantly exhausted in a really nice way, I always sleep very well. But, you know, to each their own.
STUDY Not enough sleep? Why you may be getting fatter and sicker
You may think you can get by on four or five hours of sleep, but your fat cells beg to differ.
Lack of shut-eye reduces fat cells’ ability to respond to insulin, a hormone that regulates energy, researchers have found.
In a study published in the Annals of Internal Medicine, participants were limited to 4-and-a-half hours in bed each night. After four nights of reduced sleep, their fat cells behaved like those of obese people and patients with Type 2 diabetes.
“Fat cells need sleep,” says study author Matthew Brady, associate professor of medicine and vice-chair of the committee on molecular metabolism and nutrition at the University of Chicago.
Previous research has linked sleep deprivation to weight gain and obesity. However, this is the first study to investigate sleep’s role in energy metabolism at the cellular level.
Brady and colleagues recruited six men and one woman for the study. All were young, lean and healthy. In the first study period, they spent 8.5 hours a night in bed for four consecutive nights. Four weeks later, they spent 4.5 hours in bed for four nights. Their food intake was strictly controlled in both study periods.
On the morning after each four-night stint, participants took an intravenous glucose tolerance test, which measures the body’s insulin sensitivity. The researchers also removed abdominal fat cells near each participant’s navel to measure how the fat cells responded to insulin.
After four nights of inadequate rest, all seven participants showed a decline in insulin response. Total-body insulin response decreased by an average of 16 per cent, while the insulin sensitivity of their fat cells decreased by 30 per cent.
“We were surprised by the magnitude of the change,” Brady says.
When fat cells become insulin resistant, it’s a double whammy for a person trying to lose weight. Metabolism is likely to drop while the appetite goes into overdrive, Brady says, adding that decreased insulin sensitivity could lead to metabolic disorders such as Type 2 diabetes.
Brady and colleagues didn’t study how long it would take for the participants’ fat cells to return to normal functioning, but he predicts that after four nights of poor sleep, “you’d bounce back within several days.”
The bigger question, he says, is “can we take sick people, such as those with the common combination of sleep apnea, obesity and diabetes, improve their sleep and make them better?”
Although research is under way, increasing the duration and quality of a patient’s sleep is not a proven intervention for obesity and related disorders, notes Ari Shechter a sleep expert at the New York Obesity Research Center. But he adds, “I think anything that would improve sleep continuity, sleep duration and improve sleep architecture would have the potential to improve the symptoms associated with metabolic disorders, including obesity and glucose regulation.”
The obesity epidemic in North America coincides with dramatic changes in our sleep habits, Shechter points out. He and other researchers estimate the average duration of sleep per night has decreased by about two hours since the 1960s. He calls the University of Chicago study “a step in the right direction, finding this cellular mechanism that is underlying the associations we see on a more global level.”
But he adds the study should be replicated with a larger sample size and include people with metabolic disorders to see if their fat cells react in similar ways to inadequate sleep.
Despite the lack of evidence that improving sleep helps weight loss, obesity experts are urging individuals to get more Zs.
The Canadian Obesity Network recently listed sleep and stress management as the top intervention in its obesity management guidelines – ahead of diet or exercise.
Studies have shown that people who don’t get enough sleep consume extra calories, often in the form of unhealthy snacks, says Arya Sharma, an obesity specialist at the University of Alberta and scientific director of the Canadian Obesity Network.
Sharma notes the quality of a person’s sleep is as important as the duration. “There are people who need less sleep than others, but I think one of the best measures is whether people are sleepy.”
He adds that chronic fatigue is a barrier to weight loss. “If you’re not getting good sleep, that’s going to affect your activity levels, your energy levels and your eating behaviour,” he says.
U.S. election: Barack Obama comes out swinging at Mitt Romney in presidential debate
WASHINGTON—There is, it turns out, an Angry Barack Obama.
Fact-checking last night's debate
Tuesday night he showed himself at last — eyes flashing, teeth clenched, fitted with fact and fury — intent on stopping the bleeding that threatens to cost him his job.
But Mitt Romney was steeled as well, determined to deepen the damage done two weeks ago, when Obama, in seeming absentia, let the Republican challenger breezily claim the mantle of middle-class moderate.
This one was no cakewalk, as the two traded blows through 90 feisty minutes running the gamut of all that ails America.
And as Round 2 of the three-stage U.S. presidential debates came to an end, the see-saw struggle for the White House was back in play, now more than ever.
Read more: U.S. election
Stomping over each other’s words repeatedly as they worked for face time in front of a town-hall audience in Long Island, the night saw both men score powerful points on multiple fronts.
Obama landed one of the night’s biggest blows on the question of what separates Romney from his Republican predecessor George W. Bush, portraying Romney’s agenda as “more extreme.”
“You know, George Bush didn’t propose turning Medicare into a voucher. George Bush embraced comprehensive immigration reform. He didn’t call for ‘self-deportation,’ ” said Obama.
“George Bush never suggested that we eliminate funding for Planned Parenthood. So there are differences . . . in some ways (Romney’s) gone to a more extreme place when it comes to social policy. I think that’s a mistake. That’s not how we’re going to move our economy forward.”
For a few fleeting seconds, Romney looked stricken. But he recovered — sparring, sniping, interrupting and ultimately scoring comparatively strong blows in his own scathing indictment of the economic toll of the Obama years.
“The president has tried, but his policies haven’t worked,” Romney said. “He’s great as a speaker and at describing his plans and his vision. That’s wonderful, except we have a record to look at and that record shows that he just hasn’t been able to cut the deficit.”
If expectations are anything, Obama outscored on points. From the diplomatic hot potato of dead diplomats in Libya (“I have full responsibility”) to side-battles on immigration and job parity for women, the incumbent outpaced his opponent.
Even before the debate was over, Romney had earned his own meme, as social-media watchers went to town on the odd phrasing about “binders full of women” Romney had received in his efforts to add women to his cabinet during his stint as Massachusetts governor.
In a back-and-forth over outsourcing and trade with China, Romney went on the offensive, driving home the point that Obama’s own pension fund includes Chinese investments.
As Romney moved in, firing and refiring the question of whether Obama had “looked at his pension lately,” Obama answered, “You know, I don’t look at my pension that often — it’s not as big as yours.”
Romney rang the bell twice for the controversial Keystone XL pipeline, as part of his pitch for a fresh approach to North American energy, insisting one of his first orders of business would be to approve “that pipeline from Canada.”
Obama answered that he’s “all for pipelines” — but that’s only “half the equation,” stressing his vision of an energy future depends equally on alternative sources if the U.S. economy is to keep pace with China and Germany, the incubators of wind and solar innovation.
Each debate comes replete with its own built-in sideshow over the role of the moderator. Tuesday’s micro-drama fixed on CNN’s Candy Crowley, who insisted she would break rules crafted mutually by the Obama and Romney camps aimed at quashing follow-up questions.
She got her way in the end. And in one of the night’s sharpest exchanges, she went beyond, playing fact-checker to Romney’s assertion that Obama was tardy condemning the Sept. 11 attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi an act of “terror.”
Crowley cut Romney short, citing Obama’s day-after speech. And while all agree Obama used the word “terror” in remarks delivered in the Rose Garden, Crowley’s interjection set off its own firestorm of debate on whether the president’s phrasing added up to a full Romney rebuttal.
Only in closing did Obama raise what once was perceived as the elephant in the room — Romney’s hidden-camera remark, since renounced, about “47 per cent” of Americans seeing themselves as helpless victims.
But it was Romney who opened the door, answering a final question about “the biggest misperception” by saying: “The president’s campaign has tried to characterize me a someone who’s very different than who I am. I can about 100 per cent of the American people.”
Obama leapt on the number, finally unloading the mouthful that never came out during the first debate.
“When he said behind closed doors that 47 per cent of the country consider themselves victims who refused personal responsibility, think about who he was talking about,” said Obama.
“Folks on Social Security who’ve worked all their lives, veterans who’ve sacrificed for this country, students who are out trying to hopefully advance their own dreams but also this country’s dreams, soldiers overseas, fighting for us right now, working hard every day paying payroll taxes, gas taxes, but don’t make enough income. I want to fight for them,” Obama said.
But it is the numbers that come out of Tuesday’s debate that really matter — polling data that will be parsed obsessively in the coming days for any slightest sign of daylight in an election now far too close to call.
The first few flash polls early Wednesday — including surveys of uncommitted voters by CBS, CNN, CNBC and Public Policy Polling — all pointed to Obama as stronger, albeit by a slim margin.
But with more than 20 different political surveys dropping daily, partisans of all stripes are able to spin the data favourably by cherry-picking, flagrantly or otherwise, the kindest numbers.
New York Times resident statistician Nate Silver, who builds averages from a broad range of polls, forecast Obama as a modest favourite going into Tuesday’s debate, with a 2-in-3 chance of winning the election and a slight advantage, about 1 per cent, in the popular vote.
Romney thought he caught Obama in a lie – but he was wrong
President Barack Obama and Republican challenger Mitt Romney sparred for the second time Tuesday night in a townhall debate. Mr. Romney was widely considered to have won the first match, so we asked our panel of Canadians living in the U.S. who won last night’s contest.
One controversial exchange had Mr. Romney accuse Mr. Obama of not referring to the September attack on the Libyan embassy as an act of terror. Mr. Obama countered that he had used the word "terror" in a White House speech the day after, which was confirmed by the debate moderator Candy Crowley.
New planet discovered in our back yard, raising hopes for discovery of Earth-like planet
WASHINGTON—European astronomers say that just outside our solar system they’ve found a planet that’s the closest you can get to Earth in location and size.
It is the type of planet they’ve been searching for across the Milky Way galaxy and they found it circling a star right next door — 40 trillion kilometers away. But the Earth-like planet is so hot its surface may be like molten lava. Life cannot survive the 2,200 degree heat of the planet, so close to its star that it circles it every few days.
The astronomers who found it say it’s likely there are other planets circling the same star, a little farther away where it may be cool enough for water and life. And those planets might fit the not-too-hot, not-too-cold description sometimes call the Goldilocks Zone.
That means that in the star system Alpha Centauri B, a just-right planet could be closer than astronomers had once imagined.
It’s so close that from some southern places on Earth, you can see Alpha Centauri B in the night sky without a telescope. But it’s still so far that a trip there using current technology would take tens of thousands of years.
But the wow factor of finding such a planet so close has some astronomers already talking about how to speed up a 40 trillion-kilometre rocket trip there. Scientists have already started pressuring NASA and the European Space Agency to come up with missions to send something out that way to get a look at least.
The research was released online Tuesday in the journal Nature. There has been a European-U.S. competition to find the nearest and most Earthlike exoplanets — planets outside our solar system. So far scientists have found 842 of them, but think they number in the billions.
While the newly discovered planet circles Alpha Centauri B, it’s part of a system of three stars: Alpha Centauri A, B and the slightly more distant Proxima Centauri. Systems with two or more stars are more common than single stars like our sun, astronomers say.
This planet has the smallest mass — a measurement of weight that doesn’t include gravity — that has been found outside our solar system so far. With a mass of about 1.1 times the size of Earth, it is strikingly similar in size.
Stephane Udry of the Geneva Observatory, who heads the European planet-hunting team, said this means “there’s a very good prospect of detecting a planet in the habitable zone that is very close to us.”
And one of the European team’s main competitors, Geoff Marcy of the University of California Berkeley, gushed even more about the scientific significance.
“This is an historic discovery,” he wrote in an email. “There could well be an Earth-size planet in that Goldilocks sweet spot, not too cold and not too hot, making Alpha Centauri a compelling target to search for intelligent life.”
Harvard planet-hunter David Charbonneau and others used the same word to describe the discovery: “Wow.”
Charbonneau said when it comes to looking for interesting exoplanets “the single most important consideration is the distance from us to the star” and this one is as close as you can get. He said astronomers usually impress the public by talking about how far away things are, but this is not, at least in cosmic terms.
Alpha Centauri was the first place the private Search for Extra Terrestrial Intelligence program looked in its decade-long hunt for radio signals that signify alien intelligent life. Nothing was found, but that doesn’t mean nothing is there, said SETI Institute astronomer Seth Shostak.
The European team spent four years using the European Southern Observatory in Chile to look for planets at Alpha Centauri B and its sister stars Alpha Centauri A and Proxima Centauri. They used a technique that finds other worlds by looking for subtle changes in a star’s speed as it races through the galaxy.
Part of the problem is that the star is so close and so bright — though not as bright as the sun — that it made it harder to look for planets, said study lead author Xavier Dumusque of the Geneva Observatory.
One astronomer who wasn’t part of the research team, wondered in a companion article in Nature if the team had enough evidence to back such an extraordinary claim. But other astronomers said they had no doubt and Udry said the team calculated that there was only a 1-in-1,000 chance that they were wrong about the planet and that something else was causing the signal they saw.
Finding such a planet close by required a significant stroke of good luck, said University of California Santa Cruz astronomer Greg Laughlin.
Dumusque described what it might be like on this odd and still unnamed hot planet. Its closest star is so near that it would always hang huge in the sky. And whichever side of the planet faced the star would be broiling hot, with the other side icy cold.
Because of the mass of the planet, it’s likely a rocky surface like Earth, Dumusque said. But the rocks would be “more like lava, like a lava planet.”
“If there are any inhabitants there, they’re made of asbestos,” joked Shostak.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)